This judicial analysis scrutinises how, in the context of the CEAS, members of courts and tribunals should either review the evidence and credibility assessment undertaken by the determining authority (or court or tribunal of lower instance) or carry out evidence and credibility assessment themselves. This judicial analysis provides a general introduction, an overview of the relevant EU legal framework; an overview of the judicial context, defining the varying tasks of members of courts and tribunals and outlining relevant challenges; an analysis of the specific principles and standards on evidence and credibility assessment in the light of EU law and relevant jurisprudence; an analysis of specific aspects of evidence and credibility assessment; an outline of the multidisciplinary factors that need to be taken into account in assessing evidence and credibility.