Latest Asylum Trends

Monthly Overview​

 

 

 

Applications

Main citizenships​

 

At the start of 2025, the asylum landscape in the EU+ experienced a significant shift. For the last decade, Syrians had been the largest group of asylum seekers in the EU+ but in the first quarter of 2025 this trend reversed with Syrian applications dropping sharply to fifth place in March, while Venezuelans emerged as the top applicant group. At the same time Germany, which had long been the leading destination for asylum seekers in the EU+, ended the month with fewer applications than Spain, Italy and France. The shift in Germany's position as the primary receiving country within the EU+ indicates a change in the distribution of asylum applications across the region.

The drop in Syrian applications has been extremely abrupt. In December 2024, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, (HTS) seized control of Damascus, overthrowing the Assad regime and a new transitional Syrian government was established in March 2025. These events coincided with a steep downward trend in Syrians seeking protection in EU+ – monthly Syrian asylum applications fell from roughly 16,000 in October 2024 to just 3,300 in March 2025, a steep fivefold decrease in as many months. This downturn, the like of which has not been seen since the initial wave of COVID-19 lockdowns when many borders and asylum offices were effectively closed, is likely not due to any asylum policy changes in the EU+. While it is true that most EU+ countries have suspended processing Syrian asylum applications until the situation in Syria becomes clearer, they are still accepting new claims. Rather, the shift likely reflects changing circumstances in Syria. With the new authorities advocating for stability and reconstruction, many displaced Syrians have evidently become more hopeful about returning to rebuild their communities, making them less inclined to seek asylum in the EU+.

That said, a wave of retaliatory violence led around 10,000 Alawites to flee the coastal governorate of Latakia for Lebanon in March although this may be an isolated event. For an updated analysis of the situation in Syria following the ousting of Bashar Al-Assad, refer to the latest EUAA country of origin information report: Syria - Country Focus.

In contrast, asylum applications from Venezuelan nationals have been steadily on the rise. Indeed, in March 2025, Venezuelans were the most common citizenship seeking asylum in the EU+, with around 9,000 applications, which is a 58% increase compared to the same month in 2024. This surge is part of an ongoing trend, as Venezuelans have been among the top applicant groups in recent years. The vast majority of these claims are lodged in Spain, where a shared language and established diaspora make it the primary destination. Although most Venezuelan applicants do not receive international protection, Spanish authorities tend to grant them a national form of protection, allowing them to stay.

Multiple factors are likely driving the rise in Venezuelan applications. The severe economic and political crisis in Venezuela continues to uproot people. Additionally, evolving migration policies in the US may be influencing where Venezuelans seek refuge. In late 2024, the United States tightened their asylum rules and resumed deportation flights for Venezuelans, which may have discouraged some from trying to go there. Facing these barriers, more Venezuelans may turn their focus towards the EU+. Importantly, Venezuelan citizens can travel visa-free to the Schengen area for short stays, making it relatively easy to fly to countries like Spain and then apply for asylum. Indeed, roughly a quarter of all asylum seekers in the EU+ come from nations whose citizens enjoy visa-free access to Schengen (for an annual chart, click here).

Afghans have also long played an important role in the asylum landscape in the EU+. In March 2025, they lodged 7,400 applications forming part of a stable trend over the last year. Looking further back in time, applications were much reduced compared the peak of the autumn of 2023 but still, Afghans were ranked second in March 2025 among all citizenships seeking asylum. Greece has been receiving increasing numbers of Afghan applications, which is important because the Greek Council of State recently ruled that Turkey was unsafe for refugees, meaning that their applications will now need to be processed individually. Read an EUAA Country Focus report on the general security and humanitarian situation in Afghanistan, plus Country Guidance, which focusses on the key elements of qualification for international protection.

Despite being eligible for temporary protection, more Ukrainians have also been applying for international protection in the EU+ (even though numbers still remain way lower than registrations for temporary protection). In March 2025, Ukrainians lodged 3,400 asylum applications, which is up by 77% compared to a year previously in March 2024, and placed Ukrainians third among all citizenships seeking protection in the EU+. The increase was concentrated in France, where in March 2025 more than half of all Ukrainian applications were lodged, followed by Poland with nearly a third (see chart). See also section on Migrants from Ukraine.

For the last 2 years, significant numbers of Bangladeshis have been seeking asylum in the EU+ sometimes lodging more than 4,000 applications in a single month. In March 2025, Bangladeshis lodged 3,300 applications somewhat reduced compared to a year earlier but still placing them fourth among all citizenships. The vast majority (85%) of Bangladeshi applications were lodged in Italy where repeated applications were extremely rare, suggesting that the applicants were newly-arrived to the EU+. Read an EUAA Country Focus report which highlights issues relevant to international protection in the assessment of claims from Bangladeshi nationals.

In recent months the conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo has escalated rapidly. At the same time there have been calls for action in response to the escalating human rights crisis. Talks in Qatar have resulted a shaky cease fire, but many are seeking asylum in the EU+. In March 2025 some 1,700 Congolese (DR) applications were lodged in the EU+, which is an increase of 57% compared to a year previously. Three quarters were lodged in France, where repeated applications represented 11% of all applications. 

In the autumn of 2023, Turkish nationals suddenly sought international protection in the EU+ in unprecedented numbers such that for a short time they ranked second among all citizenships applying for asylum. This influx was likely driven by several factors including political dissidents. In 2023, this Germany-centred surge was short-lived with far fewer Turks seeking protection in subsequent months, such that in March 2025, Turks lodged just 2,600 applications which is down by 32% compared to a year previously. However, recent protests against the arrest of Erdogan’s main political rival do not bode well for stability in Türkiye.

 

 

 

Trends​

 

This chart above provides a comprehensive overview of March’s top 20 nationalities' asylum application trends, smoothing out month-to-month fluctuations by comparing data from the past 12 months (blue) with the preceding 12 months (yellow). Syrians and Afghans lodged the most applications for asylum during both of these time periods. However, both of these citizenships lodged fewer applications compared to the previous period, Syrians -30% and Afghans -22%.

In the EU+ as a whole, among the top 20 nationalities only Ukrainian, Malian and Haitian nationals lodged significantly more applications in the 12 months leading up to March 2025 compared to the preceding 12 months, registering 99%, 64% and 104% increases between these two time periods. However, figures at the EU+ level can conceal important changes taking place within individual EU+ countries:

For example:

  • In Spain, fewer Colombians (-34%) contrasted with many more Venezuelans (+21%), Malians (+297%) and Senegalese (+72%).

  • In France, the number of Ukrainian applications increased threefold between the reporting periods (+195%), while the number of Haitians doubled (+107%) and Congolese (DR) increased by nearly a third (+29%). On the other hand, 23% fewer Afghans sought protection in France. 

  • In Italy, more Bangladeshis (+20%), Peruvians (+81%) and Moroccans (+77%) sought protection, whereas far fewer Pakistanis (-26%) and Egyptians (-39%) lodged applications.

  • In Germany, in asylum landscape was still dominated by Syrians (-32%), Afghans (-30%) and Turks (-60%) but all lodging fewer applications.

 

Destinations

 

For more than a decade, Germany had been at the forefront of the asylum situation in the EU+ but in the first quarter of 2025, it was no longer the top destination for asylum seekers. In March 2025, Germany received 11,000 applications, a drop of 42% compared to March 2024. Spain was the main receiving country in the EU+ with 14,000 applications even though this number hardly changed from March 2024. While Italy and France both received 13,000 applications, in Italy applications fell by 16% whereas in France applications remained steady compared with a year previously. Taken together applications in these four receiving countries represented three quarters of all applications lodged in the EU+.

Despite remarkably similar numbers of applications being lodged in the main receiving countries, there were major differences in the nature of the caseloads. For example, there is a remarkable lack of overlap between the citizenships that tend to apply in the main receiving countries: as the chart above illustrates, in Spain a noteworthy 60% of all applications were lodged by Venezuelans; in Italy a third of all applications were lodged by Bangladeshis and Peruvians; in France nearly a quarter of all applications were lodged by Ukrainians and Congolese (DR); and in Germany half of all applications were lodged by Afghans, Syrians and Turks.

Certain nationalities predominantly lodge their asylum applications in a single EU+ country, reflecting localised patterns. In March 2025, nearly all applicants from Haiti and three quarters of all applicants from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (77%) were in France, the vast majority of Venezuelans (94%) and most Malians (75%) lodged their applications in Spain, whereas most Bangladeshis (85%), Peruvians (77%) and Indians (79%) sought protection in Italy. No longer among the top applicant groups, nearly two thirds of Syrians lodged their applications in Germany. These concentrations can be seen in the Overview section.

 

 

Per capita

 

Evaluating which EU+ countries tend to receive the most applications for asylum is important but to some extent a simple like-for-like comparison is not appropriate because the EU+ countries vary wildly in terms of the size and capacity of their asylum and reception systems. For more information, read an EUAA report on the national authorities responsible for different steps of the asylum and reception systems. As a rough measure of their overall capacity and a more nuanced estimation of the pressure exerted on national authorities, this chart illustrates the number of asylum applications lodged per million inhabitants (using Eurostat population data).

In March 2025, Greece, with a population size of around 10.4 million received around 4,600 asylum applications. This amounts to a rate of 446 applications per million population or 1 application for every 2,200 inhabitants. France for example, may have received many more applications for asylum (13,000) but, given its larger population of 68 million, the French rate was much lower, at 189 applications per million inhabitants or 1 application per 5,300 inhabitants. Germany and Slovenia, while receiving very different numbers of applications per se (11,000 and 270 respectively) actually received very similar numbers per capita, at around 127 applications per million population.

Hungary, despite a population size approaching 10 million, had just 5 applications for asylum in March 2025 mostly because third-country nationals seeking protection in Hungary can only apply after submitting a declaration of intent at a Hungarian embassy in a non-EU country. In December 2020, the European Court of Justice held that Hungary failed to comply with the rules of EU law on procedures for granting international protection and returning illegally staying third-country nationals. For more details read point 13 of the EUAA Factsheet on Jurisprudence of the CJEU in 2024.

Taking the whole EU+ into consideration: its population of 463 million and 67,000 asylum applications received in March 2025 converts into 145 applications per million population or about 1 application for every 6,900 persons. 

 

Recognition rates

Main citizenships​

 

Over the last two years, the recognition rate, which reflects the percentage of asylum applicants that receive decisions granting either refugee status or subsidiary protection, has fluctuated around 40% at first instance, with more decisions granting refugee status rather than subsidiary protection.

In the first quarter of 2025, the EU+ recognition rate fell to its lowest level outside of the COVID-19 pandemic, and stood at 25%. This decline was driven by a sharp drop in decisions issued to Syrian applicants, who had typically received a high number of positive outcomes. Most EU+ countries temporarily paused the processing of Syrian asylum claims during this period, pending greater clarity on the security and political situation in Syria. As a result, the number of decisions issued to Syrians fell significantly—from a typical monthly volume of over 10,000 to approximately 2,800 in March 2025. Of these decisions, only around 9% were positive, in stark contrast to the usual recognition rate of 90% or higher for Syrian nationals.

Importantly, this shift does not reflect stricter qualification for granting international protection to Syrians. Instead, the lower recognition rate appears to be largely driven by procedural factors: many Syrians have withdrawn their asylum applications, which is, in some EU+ countries, recorded statistically as a negative decision. This may reflect evolving intentions among Syrian applicants, with some possibly planning to return home given the recent political developments in Syria.

As the Syrian example illustrates, the EU+ recognition rate is a composite indicator shaped by diverse trends, including differences between citizenships and various other characteristics. Recognition rates for different nationalities can vary significantly. For example, Afghan applicants have a recognition rate of around 60%, while nationals from Türkiye and Pakistan have rates around 20% and 10%, respectively. While many recognition rates remain fairly stable over time—such as those for Georgians and Bangladeshis, who maintained recognition rates of below 5% in March 2025—there are notable exceptions to this general pattern:

  • Syrians: The recognition rate has been above 90% for most of the last two years with most decisions granting subsidiary protection rather than refugee status. At the beginning of 2025 many withdrawn applications resulted in a misleading recognition rate of 9% in March 2025

    • For an updated analysis of the situation in Syria following the ousting of Bashar Al-Assad, refer to the latest EUAA country of origin information report: Syria - Country Focus.

  • Haiti: Since early-2023 the recognition rate has been increasing from 25% to 90% in March 2025 with most decisions granting subsidiary protection.

  • Turks: The recognition rate has been in steady decline for more than the last two years, reaching 12% in March 2025.

 

Across the EU+​

 

The aim of EUAA’s work is to foster a harmonised implementation of the Common European Asylum System across the EU so as to reach a situation where an application for international protection would receive the same decision, no matter where it was lodged. Recognition rates – the percentage of asylum applications that receive decisions granting refugee status or subsidiary protection – are sometimes cited as an indicator of the level of such harmonisation between EU+ countries.

It is important to recognise that several objective factors may lead to variations in recognition rates. The complexity of an asylum application and its examination cannot be reduced to a single measure such as the nationality of the applicant. Differences in the underlying profile of the applicant, national jurisprudence and national policies, and the application of certain legal concepts also come into play and can result in different recognition rates. For more information, read the EUAA Pilot Convergence Analysis which focuses on the main factors leading to variations in recognition rates as well as on measures to achieve greater convergence. Irrespective of underlying causes, the chart presented here illustrates recognition rates across the EU+ for various citizenships. In each column, individual circles of the same colour represent different issuing countries, with the size of each circle reflecting the number of decisions issued, and their placement on the vertical axis indicating the corresponding recognition rate—namely, the percentage of decisions that granted refugee status or subsidiary protection.

Between January and March 2025, the EU+ recognition rate for Afghans stood at 59% but as the chart shows, there was much variation between receiving countries (leftmost column of black circles). Most decisions were issued by Germany (the biggest circle, labelled) where the January-March 2025 recognition rate stood at just 32%. However, it is important to note that Germany also issued many decisions to Afghans granting a national form of protection (31% of all German first instance decisions issued to Afghans, counted here as negative decisions for international protection), which would push up the ‘inclusive’ German recognition rate to 63%, and the EU+ recognition rate for Afghans to 74%. Greece also issued many decisions to Afghans but with a much higher January-March 2025 recognition rate of 98%, compared with 65% in France and 85% in Austria. To visualise these differences, click here. Read EUAA Country Guidance on Afghanistan and EUAA Country Focus on Afghanistan.

 

<20% recognition​

 

A new feature of the Asylum and Migration Pact is the mandatory border procedure, which as of June 2026 will apply to certain categories of asylum seekers including those coming from countries with low recognition rates for international protection. The aim of the border procedure is to make a quick assessment at the EU's external borders of whether applications are unfounded or inadmissible. People in the asylum border procedure would not be authorised to enter the territory of the EU. For more details read the Asylum Procedures Regulation Art 42(j) 2024/1348.

In March 2025, some 53% of applications were lodged by citizenships who had recognition rates of 20% or less in 2024. This estimation was calculated using EUAA data, plus to ensure statistical reliability, our calculations excluded citizenships that received fewer than 1,000 decisions in 2024. This exclusion is necessary because, when the sample size is small, a few additional positive or negative decisions can dramatically alter the calculated recognition rate, potentially leading to unstable or misleading estimates.

The chart above shows the main citizenships that applied for asylum in March 2025, separated into whether or not they fall into the category of having a recognition rate of 20% or less in 2024. Applications visualised in the chart capture three quarters (74%) of all applications lodged in March 2025.

In April 2025 the European Commission published a proposal of seven countries considered safe at the Union level, which will apply to all EU Member States if approved by the European Parliament and the Council. In practice, the application of this list means Member States will use an accelerated procedure to individually assess asylum applications from nationals of these countries. The proposed list of safe countries of origin includes Bangladesh, Colombia, Egypt, India, Kosovo1, Morocco and Tunisia which together accounted to 17% of all applications lodged in March 2025.

 

 

Pending cases​

First instance​

 

Pending first instance asylum cases represent applications awaiting an initial decision from national asylum authorities. This metric serves as a critical indicator of the workload faced by asylum systems and the pressure exerted on reception facilities. As of the end of March 2025, the number of pending first instance cases remained stable but at a high level of 955,000.

Citizenships lodging the most applications also tend to account for the largest shares of pending cases. At the end of March 2025, Syrians (113,000), Venezuelans (105,000) and Colombians (88,000) were awaiting the most first instance decisions. Note that many of the 113,000 Syrian cases have been suspended until the situation in Syria has stabilised, and so these cases are not being processed for the time being. Among the citizenships with the most cases awaiting decisions, the biggest year-on-year increases occurred for Ukrainians (66%), Venezuelans (+58%), Peruvians (+33%) as well as Bangladeshis (25%).

Geographically, the largest absolute increase in pending cases over the past year occurred in Italy (+30%) where the Bangladeshi, Pakistan, Egyptian and Peruvian caseloads dominate, and also in Spain (+24%) where Venezuelans, Colombians and Peruvians all applied in highest numbers. In contrast, Germany's pending caseload declined by a non-trivial -25% between March 2024 and March 2025.

 

All instances​

 

Under the Early Warning and Preparedness System (EPS), EU+ asylum authorities regularly report to the EUAA the number of cases that they have pending at first instance—that is, newly lodged applications still awaiting an initial decision. However, this indicator does not reflect the full scope of the caseload being processed across the EU+ because there are also many cases pending in appeal and in review: cases pending in appeal refer to those that have been challenged before the judiciary, where applicants contest the first instance decision on points of fact and/or law. At the same time, other cases are pending in review, meaning the asylum authority has been requested to re-examine its original decision—often due to procedural concerns or new information.

To get a more comprehensive picture of the total number of all pending cases, Eurostat maintains an indicator, which tracks the number of asylum cases pending at all procedural instances. According to this indicator, at the end of February 2025 (latest available data), there were approximately 1.3 million asylum cases pending across the EU+. As shown in the chart, this number has been steadily increasing; two years ago, there were fewer than a million cases pending at all instances.

By combining Eurostat data with EUAA figures, we estimate that at the end of February 2025 about three quarters (76%) of the total pending cases were pending at first instance (964,000), while the remaining 24% (298,000) were awaiting decisions at second or higher instances.

 

Migrants from Ukraine

SAM-UKR​

 

The Survey of Asylum-related Migrants (SAM) is a multi-country tool designed to collect testimonies directly from people seeking international protection across the EU+. Based on the premise that digital literacy is increasingly prevalent, the project uses online, self-administered surveys that can be completed on smartphones and offers the possibility to survey large numbers of migrants at the same time. The primary objective of SAM is to establish a permanent system of collecting standardised, reliable and comparable data on relevant topics, such as push and pull factors, travel histories and migrants’ future aspirations. Understanding these topics both facilitates general preparedness to deal with a high number of arrivals but also helps to better inform policymakers.

On 11 April 2022, the EUAA launched the Survey of Arriving Migrants for displaced people from Ukraine (SAM - UKR), with the support of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The questionnaire was updated in February 2023 to include additional topics. Demographics of the responses since February 2023, as of 31 March 2025, are shown below. Recently the EUAA released Survey of Arriving Migrants from Ukraine: Movements and Returns Report, which also features a contribution by Gradus Research based in Kyiv.

The SAM-UKR survey is ongoing and accessible in Ukrainian, Russian and English at: https://tellusyourstorysurvey.eu/.

 

Research Image with charts about March LAT

For more information on SAM and on other projects related to displacement from Ukraine, access the following reports:

 
Cover - EUAA Survey

Surveys of Arriving Migrants from Ukraine: Movements and Returns Report

This Movements and Returns report uses 7,600 surveys to highlight the prevailing themes related to movements to the EU, intra-EU, and returns.

2023 temporary protection year in review

Providing Temporary Protection to Displaced Persons from Ukraine

The report covers national developments in the implementation of the Temporary Protection Directive, from crisis measures to changing legislation and practices.

cover

Challenges and opportunities in rapid situational awareness of Ukrainian displacement to the European Union: Some methodological insights

This Migration Research Series paper highlights four research projects employed by the EUAA that seek to understand displacement from Ukraine to the European Union.

Cover of the Report Voices in Europe: Experiences, hopes, and aspirations of forcibly displaced persons from Ukraine

Voices Europe experiences hopes and aspirations forcibly displaced persons Ukraine Executive Summary

This report highlights the prevailing themes emerging from forced displacement, drawn from the personal testimonies of over 1,500 respondents participating in the ongoing Survey of Arriving Migrants from Ukraine.

 

 

Temporary Protection​

 

In addition to asylum applications, at the end of March 2025, approximately 4.4 million individuals were benefiting from temporary protection in the EU+. This figure has remained relatively stable since early 2023 but continues to significantly contribute to the overall number of people in the EU+ with protection needs.

Temporary protection is based on a 2001 Directive which was triggered for the first time in response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The aim is to offer quick and effective assistance to people displaced to the EU+. For further details, refer to the EUAA report on the Application of the Temporary Protection Directive.

At the end of March 2025, half of all beneficiaries of temporary protection were either in Germany (1.2 million) or Poland (1 million). The chart illustrates the number of beneficiaries of temporary protection per capita being hosted in each EU+ country. At the end of March 2025, Czechia hosted just over 365,000 beneficiaries and the most beneficiaries per capita: specifically 33,000 beneficiaries per million inhabitants, or 1 beneficiary for every 30 inhabitants. Next in line, was Poland where nearly a million beneficiaries represented 27,000 per million inhabitants or 1 beneficiary per 37 inhabitants.

Data tables​

By EU+ Country​

 

By country of Origin​

 

 

 

 

National statistics and EUAA data
Country code EU+ country Authority Disclaimer
AT Austria Federal Ministry of the Interior No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
BE Belgium Office of the Commissioner-General for Refugees and Stateless Persons (CGRS)
  1. On the national website of the CGRS, decisions issued after the initial decision was annulled by the appeal board are included as first instance decisions (as they can be appealed again). These decisions are not included as first instance decisions by EUAA.
  2. Applications and decisions made in the framework of resettlement are included on the website of the CGRS.
  3. The protection rate on the website of the CGRS is a calculation based on the number of files (cases including accompanied children) and not individual persons.
  4. The official national data on applications for international protection are also published on the website of Immigration Office (International protection | IBZ) and Eurostat (where there is a separate dataset for applications in the framework of resettlement)
  5. Data provided to the EUAA are operational data provided to EUAA within short timeframes, and there might be minor differences with the final validated data. 
BG Bulgaria State Agency for Refugees No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions.
CH Switzerland State Secretariat for Migration No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
CY Cyprus Asylum Service, Ministry of Interior No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
CZ Czechia Ministry of Interior No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
DE Germany Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) National and EUAA data should be aligned for all indicators, but there may be differences for some breakdowns. Relocated applicants aren't considered in national statistics. In national statistics withdrawn applications are included in otherwise closed cases ("sonstige Verfahrenserledigungen"). Some first-instance decisions that in EUAA statistics are considered as negative decisions, in national statistics are classified as otherwise closed cases.
DK Denmark

Ministry of Immigration and Integration

The Danish Return Agency

The main causes to differences between national statistics and EUAA EPS data is the group of cases included in the statistics. For example, national statistics for asylum includes both first- and final-instance determinations and both applications, determinations in appeal, reopened cases and determinations in review.
EE Estonia European Police and Border Guard Board (in Estonian only) In general, the data should not differ, there may be cases where the data is corrected afterwards. The small difference with Eurostat data is due to the fact that Eurostat rounds the data. 
ES Spain Ministry of Interior
  1. National indicators are disaggregated by sex, citizenship and age group but there are no breakdowns for first versus subsequent applications, accompanied and unaccompanied minors or to identify decisions based on Dublin closures or relocations.
  2. The national indicator on pending cases does not contain breakdowns for the duration of pending plus it only includes applications that have passed the admission phase so national totals are likely to be lower than the EPS indicator on pending cases.
  3. The national indicator on withdrawn applications does not have a breakdown for explicit versus implicit withdrawals.
  4. The national indicator on 1st instance decisions does not have a breakdown for the duration of procedure.
  5. There is no national indicator on otherwise closed cases.
  6. National indicators include other information beyond the scope of the EPS indicators, such as provinces and and type of locations where applicants lodged their applications and main recognition rates.
FI Finland Immigration Service No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
FR France Ministry of Interior No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
FR France French Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
GR Greece Asylum Service No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
HR Croatia Ministry of Interior No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
HU Hungary National Directorate-General for Aliens Policing No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
IE Ireland International Protection Office No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
IT Italy Department of Civil Liberties and Immigration, Ministry of Interior No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
LT Lithuania Migration Department, Ministry of Interior No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
LU Luxembourg Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs National indicators do not include children born on the Luxembourgish territory during the asylum procedure of its parents, while those children are included in the EUAA statistics. Another reason for differences can be adjustments of the data that are carried out retrospectively on the provisional data provided to EUAA.
LV Latvia Office of Citizenship and Migration Affairs No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
MT Malta International Protection Agency No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
NL Netherlands Immigration and Naturalisation Service (IND) No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
NO Norway Directorate for Immigration (in Norwegian only)

Applications: National indicators are based on the date of making the applications. The revised numbers for 2022  count persons strictly. So if one person applied for both international protection and TPD only one is counted. The pseudo-algorithm for withdrawals are disregarded compared to other statuses. If a person have multiple TPDs only, the first one is counted. The same for multiple applications for international protection.


Decisions issued: National indicators are based on the most recent decision at first instance before the case is transferred to second/final instance. For example, if a person receives a decision of implicit withdrawal and then re-appears, and receives another decision this decision will be reported in the statistics. We use the same logic to Eurostat, but the first deicion is reports to EUAA."

PL Poland Office for Foreigners No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
PT Portugal Immigration and Borders Service No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 

 
RO Romania General Inspectorate for Immigration No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
SE Sweden Migration Agency No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
SI Slovenia Ministry of Interior No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 
SK Slovakia Ministry of Interior No major differences are expected between national and EUAA data. If discrepancies occur, they could be the result of differences in the timing of data extraction, the scope of data definitions, collection methodologies and/or retrospective revisions. 

 

Definitions

Asylum applications include all persons who have lodged or have been included in an application for international protection as a family member in the reporting country during the reporting month.

EU+ refers to the 27 European Union Member States, plus Norway and Switzerland.

First instance decisions include all persons covered by decisions issued on granting EU-regulated international protection status (refugee or subsidiary protection) following a first time or repeated application for international protection in the first instance determination process.

Stock of pending cases includes all cases for which an asylum application has been lodged and are under consideration by the national authority responsible for the first instance determination of the application for international protection (until the first instance decision has been issued) at the end of the reference period (i.e. last day of the reference month). It refers to the “stock” of applications for which decisions at first instance are still pending.

The EU+ recognition rate includes EU-regulated forms of protection (refugee status and subsidiary protection) and excludes national protection forms (humanitarian reasons). It is calculated by dividing the number of positive first instance decisions (granting refugee status or subsidiary protection) by the total number of decisions issued.

Low-recognition-rate citizenships refers to citizenships that were issued decisions that  granted either refugee status or subsidiary protection in ≤20% of cases. To ensure statistical reliability, we excluded citizenships that received fewer than 1,000 decisions annually. This exclusion is necessary because, when the sample size is very small, even one or two additional positive or negative decisions can dramatically alter the calculated recognition rate, potentially leading to unstable or misleading estimates.

 

 

 

  • 1

    This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.