Article 6 QD defines ‘actors of persecution or serious harm’ as follows.
Article 6(d) QD
Actors of persecution or serious harm
Actors of persecution or serious harm include:
a) the State;
b) parties or organisations controlling the State or a substantial part of the territory of the state;
c) non-State actors, if it can be demonstrated that the actors mentioned in points (a) and (b), including international organisations, are unable or unwilling to provide protection against persecution or serious harm as defined in Article 7.
Risks to which a population of a country or a section of the population is generally exposed do not normally create in themselves an individual threat which would qualify as serious harm (Recital 35 QD). Generally, persecution or serious harm must always take the form of conduct of an actor (Article 6 QD). For example, it cannot simply be the result of general shortcomings in the healthcare system of the country of origin.
The notion of State within the meaning of Article 6(a) QD should be broadly interpreted. It encompasses any organ exercising legislative, executive, judicial or any other functions and acting at any level, be it central, federal, regional, provincial, or local. It could, for example, include the civil service, armed forces, security, and police forces, etc. In some cases, a private entity may also be given State powers and therefore be considered a State actor of persecution or serious harm.
Parties or organisations controlling the State or a substantial part of the territory of the State can refer to two possible scenarios:
► Parties or organisations amounting to de facto State actors because they exercise elements of governmental authority; or
► Parties or organisations controlling a substantial part of the State’s territory in the context of an armed conflict.
Non-State actors against whom protection is not effectively provided are also recognised as actors of persecution or serious harm in the meaning of Article 6 QD. Non-State actors could, for example, include individuals and groups, such as clans and tribes, guerrillas and paramilitaries, warlords, extremist religious groups or terrorists, criminals, political parties and family members, including members of the extended family, etc.
In Afghanistan, a wide range of different groups and individuals can be considered as actors of persecution or serious harm, and a clear distinction between the different types of actors within the meaning of Article 6 QD might often be difficult to make.
The following subsections highlight the main actors of persecution or serious harm in Afghanistan in a non-exhaustive manner.