- Introduction
- Guidance note
- Common analysis
- 1. Actors of persecution or serious harm
-
2. Refugee status
- General remarks
-
Analysis of particular profiles
- 2.1. Individuals targeted by Boko Haram
- 2.2. Individuals perceived as Boko Haram members or supporters
- 2.3. Members of separatist movements and individuals perceived as supporting them
- 2.4. Members of militant groups in the Niger Delta and individuals perceived as supporting them
- 2.5. Members and perceived supporters of political parties
- 2.6. Individuals involved in and affected by conflicts between herders and farmers
- 2.7. Human rights activists, bloggers, journalists and other media workers
- 2.8. Christian and Muslim minorities in specific areas
- 2.9. Individuals accused of witchcraft or threatened in relation to ritual killings
- 2.10. Individuals targeted by student cults
- 2.11. LGBT persons
- 2.12. Victims of human trafficking, including forced prostitution
- 2.13. Women and girls
- 2.14. Children
- 2.15. Persons with disabilities or severe medical issues, including mental health issues
- 2.16. Individuals accused of crimes in Nigeria
-
3. Subsidiary protection
- 3.1. Article 15(a) QD
- 3.2. Article 15(b) QD
- 3.3. Article 15(c) QD
- 4. Actors of protection
- 5. Internal protection alternative
- 6. Exclusion
- Abbreviations and glossary
- Country of origin information references
- Relevant case law
In order to facilitate an understanding of the nature of the indiscriminate violence taking place in the different states of Nigeria, the analysis below is structured by zones. Depending on the availability and specificity of COI, parts of the analysis are provided at the state level, while others concern the states affected by the respective armed conflict in general. Where relevant, in the conclusions differentiation in the level of indiscriminate violence is made at the state level.
The map below summarises and illustrates the assessment of indiscriminate violence per state.
It should be noted that there are no states in Nigeria where the degree of indiscriminate violence reaches such a high level that substantial grounds are shown for believing that a civilian, returned to the relevant country or, as the case may be, to the relevant region, would, solely on account of his or her presence on the territory of that country or region, face a real risk of being subject to the serious threat referred to in Article 15(c) QD.