|
⚠ |
|
Please note that this country guidance document has been replaced by a more recent one. The latest versions of country guidance documents are available at /country-guidance. |
Case law referenced in the common analysis includes:
| ------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
Actors of persecution or serious harm
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Religion |
(Y and Z)
|
| ------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Membership of a particular social group |
(X, Y and Z)
|
| ------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Article 15(b) QD |
■ CJEU, MP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, case C-353/16, judgment of 24 April 2018 (MP)
■ CJEU, M’Bodj
|
| ------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Indiscriminate violence in relation to armed conflict (Article 15(c) QD) |
■ CJEU, Aboubacar Diakité v. Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides, C-285/12, Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 January 2014 (Diakité)
■ CJEU, Elgafaji v. Staatssecretaris van Justitie, C-465/07,Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 February 2009 (Elgafaji)
■ ECtHR, Sufi and Elmi v. United Kingdom, Applications nos.8319/07 and 11449/07, Judgment of 28 June 2011
(Sufi and Elmi)
|
| ------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Internal protection alternative |
■ CJEU, X, Y and Z
■ CJEU, Y and Z
(Abdulla)
(A.A.M v Sweden)
(Salah Sheekh)
|
| ------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Exclusion |
(Lounani)
■ CJEU, Bundesrepublik Deutschland v B and D, Joined Cases C-57/09 and C-101/09, Judgment of 9 November 2010
(B and D)
■ ICTY (Appeals Chamber), Prosecutor v Kunarac et al., IT-96-23 and IT-96-23/1-A, Judgment of 12 June 2002
■ ICTY, Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic aka "Dule" (Opinion and Judgment), IT-94-1-T, Judgment of 7 May 1997
|
| ------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
For additional information on relevant case law see:
EASO Practical Guides:
Available at: /practical-tools
■ EASO Practical Guide: Qualification for international protection
■ EASO Practical Guide: Exclusion
Judicial analyses:
Available at: /courts-and-tribunals
■ Judicial Analysis ‘Qualification for International Protection (Directive 2011/95/EU)
■ Judicial Analysis ‘Article 15(c) Qualification Directive (2011/95/EU)
■ Judicial Analysis ‘Exclusion: Articles 12 and 17 Qualification Directive (2011/95/EU)