4.8.6 Detention of children and applicants with special reception needs
The recast Reception Conditions Directive, Article 11 foresees additional safeguards and guarantees for vulnerable persons, while minors, particularly unaccompanied ones, should only be detained under exceptional circumstances. UN treaty bodies conduct periodic country reviews and manage individual complaints mechanisms to ensure that detention practices uphold human rights.
In this context, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child called on Poland to ensure that asylum-seeking children, refugee children, children in situations of migration and families with children are not placed in guarded detention centres.
Similarly, the Committee on the Rights of the Child recommended to Switzerland to ensure that authorities in charge of asylum procedures comply with the rights and best interests of the child in all decisions related to the transfer, detention or deportation of any asylum-seeking or refugee child, including by: i) developing a procedure for assessing and determining the best interests of the child in all asylum processes; ii) strengthening coordination between the asylum system and the child protection system and ensuring that child protection professionals are involved in such decisions; and iii) exempting children from the accelerated asylum procedure. It also stressed that all cantons should take measures to prevent the placement of children with adults during police custody, pre-trial detention, administrative detention and youth welfare placement.
The CPT recommended to Malta to introduce specific measures for vulnerable groups (especially families with children, unaccompanied and separated minors, and women) and called for immediate action to transfer vulnerable people to open centres and out of detention.
On many occasions, national Ombudspersons continued to stand as the guardians for children in detention. Despite long-standing advocacy by the Ombudsperson in Slovenia and other stakeholders, the National Human Rights Institution (NHRI) highlighted the continued practice of unsuitable accommodation for minors and that practically all minors who are to be returned were detained in the Postojna detention centre.
The detention of vulnerable applicants was reviewed by the ECtHR in 2021. The court found a violation of the right to liberty as national authorities had not verified that the initial detention was a measure of last resort for which there was no other alternative and they did not consider the minority of the child who was detained with the mother. In addition, the detention of a 4-month-old baby for 11 days was considered as excessive beyond the severity threshold under the ECHR, Article 3.