Skip to main content

COMMON ANALYSIS
Last update: June 2022

The general conclusions on the reasonableness of IPA for particular profiles of applicants are based on an assessment of the general situation in [IPA location in the country], and the individual circumstances of such applicants, as outlined in the sections above.

Mogadishu

Based on the general situation in Mogadishu, and taking into account the applicable individual circumstances, internal protection alternative may be reasonable only in exceptional cases. Such exceptional cases would in particular include some able-bodied men and married couples without children with no additional vulnerabilities, who belong to locally majority clans and who have educational and professional background facilitating their access to employment, or a support network which is able to assist them in accessing basic subsistence, or those who otherwise have sufficient financial means. In the case of couples, basic subsistence in Mogadishu has to be ensured for both spouses.

Garowe and Hargeisa

In the case of single able-bodied men and married couples without children, internal protection alternative may be reasonable for those who belong to the local majority clan and can rely on its support and who have no additional vulnerabilities.

In the case of families with children and unaccompanied children, internal protection alternative would in general not be reasonable. Individual circumstances and the best interests of the child should be duly assessed.

In the case of applicants from minority groups, including clans who can be considered minorities in the local context, internal protection alternative would in general not be reasonable.

In the case of other profiles, the individual circumstances of the applicant, in particular in relation to clan affiliation, gender, age, the existence of a support/clan network, etc. should be given due consideration, when assessing the reasonableness to settle in these cities.